the foundations of geopolitics: the geopolitical future of russia

• Home
• Blog
• About
• Tutorials

The United States had a gigantic island base (American continent), completely controlled and surrounded on all sides by oceans and seas, which were not difficult to defend. Sushi trends, continental impulses cannot be unilaterally canceled, and therefore, the creation of a new land, eastern, continental Empire is a potential geopolitical inevitability. Such a project is known as the "European Empire". Paradoxically, it seems that Russia sought to best serve the Atlantic interests of progressive France and colonial-capitalist England, instead of fulfilling its natural Eurasian mission and seeking alliance with all similar (both politically and spiritually) conservative and imperial regimes. Moreover, the “Atlantization” of modern China was much more successful than in Russia, since economic liberalism without political democratization allowed China to become dependent on Western financial groups without conflict, while maintaining a totalitarian system and the appearance of political independence. The main integrating moment of this New Empire will be the fight against Atlantism and the tough rebuff of that liberal-market, "marine / Carthaginian" civilization, which the USA and planetary political, economic and military structures that serve Atlantism embody today. .e. from the implementation of the traditional atlantist plan to "strangle" the continental expanses of the continent through the seizure of coastal territories throughout Eurasia, and especially in the south and west. To fill the religious-monarchist formula with truly sacred content, lost under the influence of the secular West on the Romanov dynasty, to carry out the Orthodox “conservative revolution” in order to return to the roots of a true Christian worldview; To transform the term "nationality" from the Uvarov formula into the central aspect of the socio-political structure, make the People the main, fundamental political and legal category, contrast the organic concept of the People with quantitative norms of liberal and socialist jurisprudence, develop the theory of "people's rights"; Instead of Slavophile geopolitics, turn to Eurasian projects that reject the anti-German policies of Russia in the West and anti-Japanese policies in the East, to end the Atlantic line disguised as “Russian nationalism”; Impede the processes of privatization and capitalization, as well as the stock market game and financial speculation in the Empire, focus on corporate, collective and state control of the people over economic reality, and discard the dubious chimera of "national capitalism"; Instead of the gubernial principle, proceed to the creation of ethno-religious areas with the maximum degree of cultural, linguistic, economic, and legal autonomy, strictly restricting them to one thing in political, strategic, geopolitical, and ideological sovereignty. The New Empire is anti-Trilateral, its reverse, inverted model. Only Germany and the German people possess all the necessary qualities for the effective integration of this geopolitical region with a historical will, a well-developed economy, a privileged geographical position, ethnic homogeneity, and the consciousness of their civilizational mission.Terrestrial and ideocratic Germany has traditionally opposed merchant-marine England, and the specifics of this geopolitical and cultural confrontation noticeably affected European history, especially after the Germans finally managed to create their own state. . All these points and more, can be found in "The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical future of Russia" by Alexander Dugin. 5 “Geopolitics as destiny”; further in the text: FG). However, in parallel with the strengthening of the role of the United States and their seizure of almost complete control over the English colonies, the strategic role of England has significantly decreased, and today in Europe this country acts more as an extraterritorial floating base of the United States than as an independent force. However, on a planetary scale, Prussia, and even Germany, taken separately, are geopolitically insufficient to be taken seriously in this concept. Under the sign of “space and culture”, ethnic, political, ethical, and religious aspects were rethought. Creation of a giant geopolitical continental bloc, united, . Russia must inevitably be at the center of such an association. Chapter 2 - What are “Russian national interests”? Otherwise, an appeal to historical conflicts, misunderstandings and disputes will frustrate any attempt to create a solid and reliable base of the vital Moscow-Berlin axis. Central Asian Empire. This book is a guiding principle of the foreign policies of Russia, and reads like a checklist of Russia's actions for the last 20 years. In this concept, the term “nation” was understood as a “totality of citizens”, and not as a “people” or “peoples” in an organic, “holistic” sense. in character, since such a clarification of relations makes sense only in the absence of a more global factor, which, in practice, organizes and controls these conflicts in order to maintain disunity and fragmentation in Eurasia. China in the eastern regions of the New Empire should be compared in the West not to England, but to France, since in relation to its Eurasian Empire will be guided by two criteria in case of active opposition to Eurasian projects, China will have to be treated as a geopolitical adversary with all the ensuing consequences, but if it succeeds to create a powerful pro-Japanese and pro-Russian political lobby at the same time, in the future China itself will become a full-fledged and equal participant in the continental project. [1] If you realize that the Russian people in their essence are this imperial-building process, the strong-willed geopolitical vector of creating a "state of the Absolute Idea", it will become completely obvious that the existence of the Russian people directly depends on the. We are talking about the capitalist form of the economy that was inherent in Russia at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. The geopolitical construction of this Empire should be based on the fundamental principle of the principle of "common enemy". It is important to emphasize right away that the unification of Europe around Germany must take into account the major political miscalculations of previous attempts, and first of all, the failure of the epic of Hitler and the Third Reich. The Soviet Empire and ideologically and actually destroyed. Moscow, as the center of Eurasia, its pole, should delegate to Tehran the mission of guiding the "Iranian world" (Pax Persica) in this space, organizing a strong Central Asian geopolitical bloc that can withstand Atlantic influence throughout the region. , without pressure from the Atlantic forces, which are fundamentally interested in only one thing, to prevent peace, harmony, prosperity, independence, dignity and prosperity of Tradition in Eurasia. Chapter 2 - What are “Russian national interests”? Moreover, the seriousness of the geopolitical confrontation has always been reflected in the fact that Russia federated within itself and around itself different countries and peoples into a powerful strategic imperial bloc. In the West, the New Empire has a strong geopolitical bridgehead, which is Central Europe. The presence of a powerful pro-Russian orientation in parallel should also be taken into account, but it is difficult to imagine how these Islamic regions with an awakening national self-consciousness can again join Russia bloodlessly and painlessly. However, the integration of the Pan-Arab project with the common Eurasian Empire should be entrusted to purely European forces, returning to the projects of the Euro-Africa, which, from a purely geopolitical point of view, is not two continents, but. The "nation-state", as a rule, is governed not by a "divine idea" (like theocracy or the Holy Empire), not by a "heroic aristocratic person" (like a feudal system), but by a "dictatorship of the law" ("nomocracy"), which gives enormous power jurists and legal bureaucracy. This is a strategic and geopolitical bloc that surpasses the parameters of an ordinary state; it is a Superstate. Being largely a national-communist de facto, it never transformed into such a de jure, which impeded the organic development of Russian-Soviet society, generated a double standard and ideological contradictions, and undermined clarity and awareness in the implementation of geopolitical and socio-political projects. England is geopolitically the least European state whose strategic interests are traditionally opposed to the Central European powers and, more broadly, continental trends in Europe. In this sense, all the "regional powers" in Eurasia logically serve the interests of the Atlantists, since being unable to provide them with large-scale resistance (and this is possible only in the imperial strategic context), they are entirely dependent on a single Superpower and direct their energy to neighbors only with the sanction of overseas rulers. By cutting or suppressing this vector, we will hit the Russians in the heart, depriving them of their national identity, turning them into a historical rudiment, disrupting the global teleological, eschatological planetary process. But this state did not last very long,and China, under the pretext of disagreeing with the development of the Soviet model, returned to the dubious geopolitical function of destabilizing the Far Eastern interests of Eurasia and escalating conflicts with Russia. The USSR did not become a "nation-state", it was a successor of purely imperial national traditions, clothed in extravagant external forms and opposed by the later tsarist model, sliding down to the ordinary bourgeois society, to the "dictatorship of the law." There is no doubt that the Chinese perestroika that began in the 1980s was the final turn from the Maoist period to the pro-Atlantic model, which should have finally fixed the gap between China and the USSR and its orientation towards the West. From the East, from the geopolitical point of view, this space, directly adjacent to the Atlantic bloc, has all the signs of an anti-Atlantic, continental, land orientation and geographically gravitates to the East. 2 The impact of this intended "Eurasianist" textbook on key elements among Russian elites testifies to the worrisome rise of fascist … axis solves a huge number of problems for the New Empire. Only Iran, continentally adjoining Russia and going directly to the Indian Ocean, and then and now it could and can be a radical solution to this most important geopolitical problem. Few books published in Russia during the post-communist period have exerted such an influence on Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites as Aleksandr Dugin’s 1997 neo-fascist treatise Osnovy geopolitiki: Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii (Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geo-political Future of Russia). Despite all the internal civilizational, religious and socio-economic differences between the Eurasian powers among themselves they have a strong and unshakable "common denominator" hostility to the totality of Atlantic control, the desire to free oneself from the transatlantic custody of that Trade Order, which the USA is strenuously planting, the stronghold of the "marine" civilization. Moreover, in the current conditions it is difficult to expect from Europe a genuine geopolitical and national awakening without the revolutionary influence of the Russian factor. It is important from the very beginning to emphasize that in one or another “axial” geopolitical alliance during the creation of the Empire, we are talking about a completely different degree of integration depending on the level. It should be emphasized that the “nation” in this case has a purely and exclusively political meaning, which differs sharply from that which the nationalists put into this concept. For example, India, Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, China, etc. In many ways, French history was atlantist in nature, opposing continental and central European trends. The traditional Atlantic policy in this region was based on Mackinder’s thesis about the need to create a “sanitary cordon” here, which would serve as a conflict buffer zone, preventing the possibility of a Russian-German alliance, which is vitally dangerous for the entire Atlantic bloc. On the one hand, these regions are closely and inextricably linked with Russia, and on the other hand, they are culturally and racially close to Japan. The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia by Aleksandr Dugin - Wikipedia Synopsis on Wikipedia ^ | 1997 | Aleksandr Dugin Posted on 03/19/2017 2:01:55 PM PDT by WMarshal. Despite all the internal civilizational, religious and socio-economic differences between the Eurasian powers among themselves they have a strong and unshakable "common denominator" hostility to the totality of Atlantic control, the desire to free oneself from the transatlantic custody of that Trade Order, which the USA is strenuously planting, the stronghold of the "marine" civilization.